Some prominent physicists seem to believe that within the foreseeable future, in principle science will be able to provide a comprehensive explanation of the world in which we live. If that is the case, then belief in God in any traditional from will be ruled out. As one Nobel prizewinner has already commented, 'As a physicist you have to have a split personality if you are still to believe in God'. By contrast, in this book Professor van den Beukel demonstrates that for a professional scientist, a thoughtful, non-fundamentalist form of Christian belief need in no way lead to schizophrenia. For there are still questions which can be asked an over-confident scientist. How far is objectivity in science possible? Is what scientists describe all that there is, or are they concerned with just one aspect of a total reality which is far wider that they suggest?